Leader
The war on Wikileak’s war logs
|
23 July 2010 17:25
Many might not have heard of Wikileaks before this week, when it published nearly 91,000 American documents on the war in Afghanistan.
The United States knew about this potential leak for months and Wikileaks hinted about this three months ago, just before releasing video clips of US soldiers killing civilians.
Wikileaks is the new generation media at work. The site allows whistleblowers to submit sensitive documents or files without the fear of being traced back.
Banned in China and harassed by the Germans, Wikileaks has had some huge headline-grabbing leaks.
It published Sarah Palin’s email inbox during the presidential election, 9/11 pager messages, toxic dumping in Africa and the British National Party membership list, which incidentally included a Maltese resident.
In an age of constant monitoring and governmental intrusion, you would think Wikileaks would be glorified as the modern anti-1984. It has the potential to bring anyone to its knees.. from large corporations to the biggest governments.
But it isn’t. The site faces financial breakdown due to lack of donors. They have received huge files concerning the BP spill fiasco, but don’t have enough journalists to go through them.
The war in Afghanistan is close to being lost. Attacks on military personnel are constantly increasing, and the situation is out of control. Wikileaks didn’t need to tell us that with US official documents.
But what it will do is increase the pressure on all politicians to face the music.
And nothing may be as damning for the past US government and others as their own words which have been stored in their own filing cabinets?
Comments
Xaqq dawl fid-dalma - 29 July 2010 18:16
It also allows Government disinformation to be passed on, but I guess this would be too esoteric for the news standards of Maltastar. Just note that there is nothing new in those 'leaked' documents (it has all been reported here and there, but never headlined by the corporate media). Also, they are in digital format (which means they would have been tampered with where necessary). The fact that the Washington Post, the Guardian and Der Spiegel gave them so much prominence (and not only because Wikileaks dispatched the 'leaks' to them first), should be enough to raise alarms. The 'leaks' of course point a finger at Pakistan's 'collaboration with the Taliban' (when the CIA-backed ISI has been doing this for ages now)... other than the fact that it also 'confirms' Bin Ladin is still alive, when most intelligence reports have been saying they have no clue where Bin Ladin is and most believe he is long dead. Good that the Washington Post had confirmed the that amous post 9/11 Bin Ladin tape to be a hoax, though - otherwise who would have known? But you wouldn't know about that either...